Duncans Colonial Racial Hierarchy & Segregation

 

1. Colonial Racial Hierarchy and Segregation

British companies like Duncans operated under a clear racially stratified worldview:

  • British = rulers, administrators, and civilizers

  • Indians = subjects or laborers
    ๐Ÿ”น Socializing would challenge that hierarchy, which was central to maintaining colonial authority and exclusivity.


๐Ÿธ 2. “Club Culture” and Exclusivity

Duncans and other “Clubby” agency houses fostered a British-only corporate and social culture:

  • British officers and executives belonged to elite clubs (like the Bengal Club) which excluded Indians—even elite, westernized Indians.

  • Relationships were limited to “sahib-servant” dynamics, not equal colleagues.


๐Ÿ›ก️ 3. Fear of Cultural Contamination or Political Influence

There was a belief—especially post-1857 Revolt—that:

  • Mixing with Indians might expose British employees to nationalist sentiments, or undermine their loyalty to Empire.

  • Even friendly relationships were seen as potential threats to company discipline or imperial control.


๐ŸŽ“ 4. Recruitment and Training Practices

Duncans recruited directly from British public schools or the army, bringing in young men to India on contracts.

  • They were indoctrinated to “keep their distance”.

  • Manuals and supervisors explicitly warned against becoming “too friendly” with locals, especially subordinate staff or Indian traders.


⚖️ 5. Legal and Marital Restrictions

  • Company policies discouraged marriages or close relations with Indian women, which were seen as lowering the social status of the British employee.

  • Inheritance, caste complications, and company liability made such relationships “undesirable”.


๐Ÿ“‰ When Did This Begin to Change?

  • Only post-World War II, especially after Indian Independence (1947), did these barriers begin to break down.

  • Companies were forced to hire and promote Indians, but old habits and biases lingered well into the 1960s–70s, especially in elite circles like tea estates or Calcutta agency houses.


๐Ÿงพ Summary:

Duncans' discouragement of mixing with Indians was a combination of:

  • Imperial arrogance

  • Preservation of control

  • Deep-rooted racial beliefs

  • Structural company policies from the British colonial playbook

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Napoleon vs. the Bunnies: The Day the Emperor Lost a Battle to Rabbits

The Congress of Vienna: Diplomacy by Day, Dancing by Night

Best History Books